So where did I go?
Discontent is a curious thing. Generally it's considered bad form and whatnot, unless you're a person in power, but then it isn't discontent, it's leadership. Those in power have their discontent redefined as a movement, or a method, or a style, or a revolution, or a paradigmatic, missional shift.
But, it's discontent all the same, and people in power aren't the only ones who feel it. The very best leaders, the only real leaders in my estimation, have a discernment about discontent, a sharp eye for what is holy discontent, spurred by the Spirit in the midst of the communinity, and unholy discontent spurred by a different spirit in the community. The former is prophetic, the latter is destructive.
The harsh thing in Christian communities is there's such an utter lack of discernment, especially among leadership. I would suggest we are living in the least discerning time in Christian history. But that's not the point of this post.
Rather, I realized that in reading through the latter two books assigned my own discontent was rising. Not at the authors, not at their communities, or methods, but at my own ministry experience and my own ministry past dealing with leaders who had positions of leadership but never did lead. What did they do? They took up space, and still do, thinking that leading involves telling people what to do and how to do it, or rather what not to do and how not to do it.
That's what hits my frustrations, for in the books I was reading I was not just reading about their ministries and their events. I was reading about my own passions, I was reading the thoughts of people I knew and worked with, and struggled with. I kept saying, "Yeah, we did that." Or "Yeah, that we could have been there." Only we didn't because the hammer fell, a hammer of power, and control, and selfish ambition.
So why did I not wander off to another field, skip out on the church of my youth and begin anew. Because of the other books I read in this course which lauded communities for their vision, and knowing for myself those communities, and many like them, folded and shut down, the vision momentary and passionate, rather more like a heated affair than a real commitment.
The Emerging Church is a serial monogamist, always extremely committed to the commitment of the moment, but always drifting, drifting, drifting, so there's a whole pile of sloughed off people, once passionate, now wandering in their own frustrated discontent. The promise is beautiful for the moment, but doesn't last, because visions don't last, because commitments don't last, because leaders who style themselves new Pauls don't last. The only problem is they do not have Paul's ability to go where no one else has gone before. They stir the same pot, driving past each other, flying by each other, rebuilding on top of the smoldering ruins of the previous community.
I stepped back because that's what I saw, and didn't see in myself anything different.
I stepped back because of the studies that say well over half of those who go into ministry don't last in ministry. If I am to last in ministry I had to step back and discover what it was that would push me past the discontented, polyamorous forms of ministry that thrive in publisher and Leadership based models.
And in this is my own discontent, a holy form which pushes me to try and see, and I think I've seen something, something which peeks out in previous posts. But it's not in those books assigned, or in conversations of style, and liturgy, and yet one more attempt at authenticity.
It's something deeper, and something I haven't yet gotten my hands around, but I'm trying to. And in trying to do that I think it's sometimes better for me to remain silent, if the only words which arise are those of discontent.
That critical part of my own vision seems to push me to see something broader and helpful, but also can drive me into being judgmental or merely a plain bore. That's not the side of me I want to invest in, and neither do I want to invest in words just for the sake of words.
I enjoyed the class because of the face to face discussions, the wrestling together, the conversation, things which decidely seem to lack online, where my words seem only to serve to pad my own discontent.
That's not something I need. What I need is the Holy Spirit, and there are ways to go about finding the Spirit spoken of throughout history, and posting book reviews is not the way to go about doing it.
So there you go. My prickliness emerged, and I didn't like how it was looking.
But, it's discontent all the same, and people in power aren't the only ones who feel it. The very best leaders, the only real leaders in my estimation, have a discernment about discontent, a sharp eye for what is holy discontent, spurred by the Spirit in the midst of the communinity, and unholy discontent spurred by a different spirit in the community. The former is prophetic, the latter is destructive.
The harsh thing in Christian communities is there's such an utter lack of discernment, especially among leadership. I would suggest we are living in the least discerning time in Christian history. But that's not the point of this post.
Rather, I realized that in reading through the latter two books assigned my own discontent was rising. Not at the authors, not at their communities, or methods, but at my own ministry experience and my own ministry past dealing with leaders who had positions of leadership but never did lead. What did they do? They took up space, and still do, thinking that leading involves telling people what to do and how to do it, or rather what not to do and how not to do it.
That's what hits my frustrations, for in the books I was reading I was not just reading about their ministries and their events. I was reading about my own passions, I was reading the thoughts of people I knew and worked with, and struggled with. I kept saying, "Yeah, we did that." Or "Yeah, that we could have been there." Only we didn't because the hammer fell, a hammer of power, and control, and selfish ambition.
So why did I not wander off to another field, skip out on the church of my youth and begin anew. Because of the other books I read in this course which lauded communities for their vision, and knowing for myself those communities, and many like them, folded and shut down, the vision momentary and passionate, rather more like a heated affair than a real commitment.
The Emerging Church is a serial monogamist, always extremely committed to the commitment of the moment, but always drifting, drifting, drifting, so there's a whole pile of sloughed off people, once passionate, now wandering in their own frustrated discontent. The promise is beautiful for the moment, but doesn't last, because visions don't last, because commitments don't last, because leaders who style themselves new Pauls don't last. The only problem is they do not have Paul's ability to go where no one else has gone before. They stir the same pot, driving past each other, flying by each other, rebuilding on top of the smoldering ruins of the previous community.
I stepped back because that's what I saw, and didn't see in myself anything different.
I stepped back because of the studies that say well over half of those who go into ministry don't last in ministry. If I am to last in ministry I had to step back and discover what it was that would push me past the discontented, polyamorous forms of ministry that thrive in publisher and Leadership based models.
And in this is my own discontent, a holy form which pushes me to try and see, and I think I've seen something, something which peeks out in previous posts. But it's not in those books assigned, or in conversations of style, and liturgy, and yet one more attempt at authenticity.
It's something deeper, and something I haven't yet gotten my hands around, but I'm trying to. And in trying to do that I think it's sometimes better for me to remain silent, if the only words which arise are those of discontent.
That critical part of my own vision seems to push me to see something broader and helpful, but also can drive me into being judgmental or merely a plain bore. That's not the side of me I want to invest in, and neither do I want to invest in words just for the sake of words.
I enjoyed the class because of the face to face discussions, the wrestling together, the conversation, things which decidely seem to lack online, where my words seem only to serve to pad my own discontent.
That's not something I need. What I need is the Holy Spirit, and there are ways to go about finding the Spirit spoken of throughout history, and posting book reviews is not the way to go about doing it.
So there you go. My prickliness emerged, and I didn't like how it was looking.
1 Comments:
At 12:27 PM, Anonymous said…
Or, thirdly, it may have no relation to daily life, and belong to those wishes that originate during the http://startso11.info/Krajowy+System+Informowania+o+Kosmetykach.html night from the suppression.. It always http://startso11.info/prognoza+rozowoju+rynku+kapita%C5%82owego.html makes me feel sorry when I think of that last fight of his'n, and the way it turned out.. But I http://startso11.info/www.literka.html shall not take de seat, sare.. It would rather seem that as we learn to control http://startso11.info/155.158.112.148%2F%7EBERNASM%2FINF.html our impulses by intellectual activity, we more and more reject as vain the formation or retention of such intense wishes as are natural to childhood.. Such a current in the apparatus which emanates from pain and strives http://storyah44.info/podatek+od+darowizn+i+spadk%C3%B3w.html for pleasure we call a wish.. She was not a http://startso11.info/narkotyki+w+rodzinie.html hard woman naturally.. But her resentment was not helping the deacon's horse to win. http://startso11.info/ceny+bilet%C3%B3w+PKP.html. Gideon leaped to his http://storyah44.info/poradnik+ogrodowy.html feet.. Finally, we may http://startso11.info/nude_kids.html add group (5) consisting of the indifferent and hence unsettled impressions of the day.. However, the bowing of the subordinate to his superior in our own http://startso11.info/KUL.html days is only an echo of that ancient principle of representation.. His parents came home late and went to bed http://startso11.info/www.szybko.pl.html while he was feigning sleep.. They do not appear to be expressed in the sober form which our thinking prefers; rather are they expressed symbolically by allegories and metaphors like the figurative language of the http://startso11.info/winamp.com.html poets.. As far as the direction is concerned in this third part of the dream, it may be said that http://storyah44.info/przepis+gofry.html here again the movement is progressive.. The impressions which have incited the dream may be so important that we are not surprised at our being occupied with them whilst awake; in this case we are http://startso11.info/www.wulcan.pl.html right in saying that the dream carries on the chief interest of our waking life.. The Colonel coughed slightly. http://wowyesaf.info/rysunek+samochodu+do+wyciecia.html. In following out the analysis I struck upon the thought: I should like http://startso11.info/promieniotworczosc+sztuczna.html to have something for nothing.. he'll be quiet enough when he gets up, said Podington. http://rebestal.info/bloog.pl.html. Gideon felt very tender, very important, at peace http://rebestal.info/bilety+na+koncert+tokio+hotel+19%2C10%2C2007r.html with himself and all the world.. These portions subsequently fitted in, regularly http://rebestal.info/rzanie.html furnish the key to the interpretation.. Not yet, replied Mr. http://rebestal.info/bsbiecz.html..
Post a Comment
<< Home